<<< Click on a cover to
view a previous article
<<< Click on a cover to
view a previous article
<<< Click on a cover to
view a previous article
Professional Hunter Ian Gibson - Inside Story
By I J Larivers
I’d met Ian Gibson - Gibbo to his friends - shortly after he’d left the Department of National Parks and Wildlife Management as a senior ranger. It was a name and a face from the past, though Zimbabwe being the microcosm it is these days you’d think folks with similar interests would bump into one another at least fairly frequently.
Ian became a professional hunter in 1987, Professional Hunter’s licence number 120, and, many years later in 2008, joined Chifuti Safaris - Chewore North in the Lower Zambezi valley was his stomping grounds.
On the morning of 15 April, Ian had left camp with his trackers, a game scout and an American client who was no stranger to African safaris. They spent some five hours on the trail of a bull elephant, but hadn’t been able to close with it to get a look at the ivory. Ian’s client was in need of a break by then, and Ian left him to rest in the company of the game scout, while sending the driver back for the Land Cruiser.
Gibbo then went ahead with his tracker to see if they could close with the elephant and get a look at the trophy size and quality. A short while later, the client and the scout heard what they described as a muffled shot.
An example of Bayaka face painting
From the account of Ian’s tracker, they got very close to the bull before they were able to see that it only had one tusk, and was not what they were looking for. But - what made all the difference in this tragic instance - was that this bull was in musth (see sidebar), and as soon as he caught their scent he turned and charged. When I spoke with Chifuti Safaris, to get an accurate account of events I was told that the bull was very close - some ten to fifteen metres. As Gibbo and his tracker turned to exfil, the bull charged. This cleared up one question I’d harboured up to that point. Ian Gibson was one of the most competent bushmen and consummate professionals in the hunting industry, and all the initial accounts said that he’d seen the bull fifty to a hundred metres away. Had it charged from that distance, Ian would have had a lot of options open to him, and would have been able to assess - as closely as one can - how serious the charge was. From even fifteen metres most if not all of those options would have evaporated into thin air.
Other PHs close by responded to the scene, reminiscent of the tragedy that had befallen another Chifuti PH, Owain Lewis who was fatally charged by a buffalo bull in 2012, and the client was safely evacuated.
There was blood spoor, so the elephant had been hit, and the following morning a party set out on the tracks of the bull - which they followed up for some thirty to thirty five kilometres - but finally lost due to a rainstorm.
When compiling this story, I called to mind the death at the hands of a herd of cow elephant by PH Gerry Von Memerty - while actually hunting buffalo, near Nyamomba, as recounted by the iconic Ian Nyschens in his classic The Months of the Sun. The above is what we know. There will always be questions, especially from the hunters and trackers who go in for the follow-up. But what is certain is that the industry has lost an immeasurably experienced professional hunter whose skill was matched only by his love for the bush and its wildlife - the four hundred plus people who attended his funeral outside of Marondera are testament to that.
But sadly, in the 21st century, there is another aspect to a story like this - the Internet. Because “information” is so rapidly accessible and transmittable, even from the African bush, there is just that much more room for misinformation to creep in. An article in one scholarly tabloid stated that “a celebrated Texas-born (?) hunter was crushed to death by a baby (!) elephant in Zimbabwe as he tried to measure (WTF?) its ivory tusks for an American client.” Even by yellow journalism standards, it’s clear that this publication doesn’t employ an editor and has never heard the term “due diligence”, which is something that writers and editors should exercise before bursting into print. It further informed its curious readers that “despite only having one leg, Gibson was described by fans as 'fit and strong'”. (The client did indeed have a prosthetic leg.) The thought of a one-legged guy in a ten gallon Stetson and cowboy boot chasing a baby elephant through the bush clutching a tape measure would truly be funny if such unnecessary stupidity did not malign the memory of a good man, not to mention tarnish the image of an entire industry in they eyes of a readership, many of whom know no better.
But even worse than this manner of almost criminally unprofessional reporting is the modern-day phenomenon of the Internet troll. We all know them - folks who have firebrand opinions on subjects universal, but only have the courage to express themselves safely within the anonymity afforded by the ‘Net. Because they lack the social maturity to discuss topics logically, not emotively, most of their diatribe is hurtful, scathing, and on a very personal level. Untold numbers of “conservationists” and “animal rightists” took Ian Gibson’s death as an opportunity not to discuss the perceived merits or demerits of sport hunting sanely, but to launch into the unwholesome and malicious slander of a man who was in deed and custom a better conservationist than any of them could ever hope to be, and whose friends and family had to bear on top of everything else.
Rest in peace, Gibbo - unlike most folks, you lived 55 years, mostly spent in the bush, doing what you loved doing. My most sincere condolences go out to Ian’s family and close friends.
MUSTH
Musth is a recurrent condition in male elephants which is, characterized by highly aggressive behaviour and accompanied by a large rise in reproductive hormones. In a bull elephant that is in musth, the levels of testosterone can be fifty to sixty times higher than when the animal is not in musth. Scientific study of elephants in musth is difficult, because they can become highly aggressive at that time.
Because the female elephant's oestrus cycle is not seasonally-linked, and musth is most commonly associated with the winter months, there is not believed to be a direct connection between musth and rut. Moreover, elephant bulls in musth are known to attack even female elephant in oestrus - so the most likely explanation is that musth is linked to the hierarchy of male dominance.
Bulls in musth can often be recognized by the secretion of temporin from their temporal glands on either side of the head - temporin is a viscous gel-like substance which contains proteinaceous material, fats, and other substances such as methylphenols. Because the temporal glands swell during this period, the pressure on the animals’ eyes is comparable to a serious toothache.
When an elephant is in musth, it is discomfited in the extreme and at the same time its urge to mate can go into overdrive. The ultimate bad-hair day is not the most opportune time to encroach upon the territory of an animal that can weigh seven tonnes!